2 Normative References
Prev     Next

2 Normative References

The following standards contain provisions that, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Standard. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All standards are subject to revision, and parties to agreements based on this Standard are encouraged to investigate the possibilities of applying the most recent editions of the standards indicated below.

Extracts of ISO/IEEE 11073 reprinted by permission of IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5997 USA. Copyright 2004 by IEEE. http://standards.ieee.org/.

Under license from IEEE, the term codes and descriptions of the ISO/IEEE 11073 Nomenclature are available at no cost through the Rosetta Terminology Mapping Management System of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. http://hit-testing.nist.gov:13110/rtmms/index.htm

This material includes an extract of SNOMED Clinical Terms® (SNOMED CT®), which is used by permission of the International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation (IHTSDO). All rights reserved. SNOMED CT®, was originally created by The College of American Pathologists. "SNOMED" and "SNOMED CT" are registered trademarks of the IHTSDO.

All the SNOMED terms used in this Standard are the subject of a royalty pre-paid licensing agreement between NEMA and CAP that allows their use in DICOM applications without further license or payment of fee

2.1 General

[ISO/IEC Directives, Part 3] ISO/IEC. 1989. Drafting and presentation of International Standards.

[UCUM] Regenstrief Institute for Health Care, Indianapolis. 2000. UCUM Unified Code for Units of Measure.

[LOINC] Regenstrief Institute for Health Care, Indianapolis. 2000. LOINC® Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes.

[SNOMED] International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation (IHTSDO). . SNOMED CT Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms.

[JJ1017] Japan Medical Imaging and Radiological Systems Industries Association (JIRA) and Japanese Association of Healthcare Information Systems Industry (JAHIS). Guidelines for HIS, RIS, PACS - Modality Data Communication on Scheduling, Billing, and Examination Records. http://www.jira-net.or.jp/commission/system/04_information/files/JJ1017VER3_20051005.doc .

[RFC 3066] IETF. . Tags for the Identification of Languages.

[IEC 60601-2-44] IEC. . Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 2-44: Particular Requirements for the Safety of X-Ray Equipment for Computed Tomography.

[ISO 639] ISO. . Codes for the representation of names of languages, International Organization for Standardization.

[ISO 3166] ISO. . Codes for the representation of names of countries, International Organization for Standardization.

[ASTM E 1762-04] ASTM. . Standard Guide for Electronic Authentication of Health Care Information, ASTM International.

[ASTM E 2084-00] ASTM. . Standard Specification for Authentication of Healthcare Information Using Digital Signatures, ASTM International.

[HL7 v3 CMET] HL7. . Version 3 Standard: Common Message Element Types.

[RadLex] RSNA, Chicago. 2006. A Lexicon for Uniform Indexing and Retrieval of Radiology Information Resources. http://www.radlex.org/ .

[ETDRS Report Number 10] ETDRS. . Report Number 10, Grading Diabetic Retinopathy from Stereoscopic Color Fundus Photographs- An Extension of the Modified Airlie House Classification. Ophthalmology, May 1991, vol98 (p786-805), Supplement.

[NEMA XR 25-2010] National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, Virginia. 2010. Computed Tomography Dose Check Standard. http://www.nema.org/stds/xr25.cfm .

[ISO/IEEE 11073-10101] ISO/IEEE. . Health informatics - Point-of-care medical device communication - Nomenclature.

[ISO/IEEE 11073-10102] ISO/IEEE. . Health informatics - Point-of-care medical device communication - Annotated ECG - Nomenclature.

[AAPM Report 204] American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park, Maryland. 2011. Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations. http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_204.pdf .

[AAPM OR 03] American Association of Physicists in Medicine. 2005. Assessment of Display Performance for Medical Imaging Systems. http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/OR_03.pdf .

[DIN 6868-57] Deutsches Institut für Normung. 2001. Image quality assurance in diagnostic X-ray departments - Acceptance testing for image display devices.

[IEC 62563-1] IEC. 2009. Ed 1.0. Medical Electrical Equipment - Medical image display systems - Part 1: Evaluation methods.

[SMPTE RP133] Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE). 1991. Specifications for Medical Diagnostic Imaging Test Pattern for Television Monitors and Hard-copy Recording Cameras.

2.2 BI-RADS® Terminology and Nomenclature

A portion of the terminology used within the Mammography CAD SR SOP Class and the Breast Imaging Report and Relevant Patient Information for Breast Imaging templates is derived from BI-RADS®, a copyrighted lexicon of breast imaging terminology and nomenclature licensed by DICOM from the American College of Radiology.

[BI-RADS®] American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia. 1998. 3.0. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/BIRADS .

2.3 MQCM 1999 Terminology and Nomenclature

References to MQCM 1999 are made in the description of the Mammography CAD SR SOP Class. In this MQCM 1999 refers to the Mammography Quality Control Manual 1999, available from the American College of Radiology. This document describes a standardized approach to mammographic acquisition standards, patient positioning, and so on. The DICOM standard does not require Mammography CAD SR SOP Class implementations to adhere to MQCM 1999.

[MQCM] American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia. 1999. Mammography Quality Control Manual. http://www.acr.org/Education/Education-Catalog/Products/639 .

2.4 MQSA Terminology and Nomenclature

References to MQSA are made in the description of the Mammography CAD SR SOP Class. In this MQSA refers to the Mammography Quality Standards Act final rules. While MQSA is a federal regulation of the United States government, it provides the only widely published standards for mammographic quality and is incorporated in this document for that reason. The DICOM standard does not require Mammography CAD SR SOP Class implementations to adhere to MQSA.

[MQSA] U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland. 2002. Mammography Quality Standards Act Regulations. http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/Regulations/ucm110906.htm .

2.5 ACR Position Statement

[ACR Position Statement] American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia. 2001. Quality Control and Improvement, Safety, Infection Control, and Patient Education. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Radiology-Safety .

2.6 Chest Radiology and CT

References are made in the description of the Chest CAD SR templates and context groups.

[Fraser and Pare] Fraser, Muller, Colman, and Pare. 1999. 4th. I. xvii-xxxi. Diagnosis of Diseases of the Chest. Terms Used in Chest Radiology.

[Fraser and Pare] Fraser, Muller, Colman, and Pare. 1999. 4th. I. xxxiii-xxxvi. Diagnosis of Diseases of the Chest. Terms for CT of the Lungs.

[ACR CT PE] American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia. 2001. 109-113. ACR Standards. ACR Standard for the Performance of Computed Tomography for the Detection of Pulmonary Embolism in Adults.

[ACR HR CT] American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia. 2001. 115-118. ACR Standards. ACR Standard for the Performance of High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) of the Lungs in Adults.

[ACR Radiography] American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia. 2001. 95-98. ACR Standards. ACR Standard for the Performance of Pediatric and Adult Chest Radiography.

[ACR Thoracic CT] American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia. 2001. 103-107. ACR Standards. ACR Standard for the Performance of Pediatric and Adult Thoracic Computed Tomography (CT).

2.7 Response Evaluation Criteria

References to Response Evaluation Criteria are made from the Chest CAD SR templates and context groups

[RECIST] Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Therasse. February 2, 2000. 92. 3. 205-216. “New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors”. http://www.eortc.be/recist/ .

[WHO] World Health Organization, Geneva. 1979. WHO Handbook for Reporting Results for Cancer Treatment. WHO Offset Publication No. 48. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/9241700483.pdf .

2.8 Myocardial Segmentation

[Cerqueira 2002] Circulation. Cerqueira MD. 2002. 105. 4. 539. “AHA Scientific Statement: Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the Heart”. doi:10.1161/hc0402.102975

2.9 Quantitation of the Left Ventricle

[Schiller 1989] Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. Schiller. Oct 1989. 2. 5. 358-367. “Recommendations for Quantitation of the Left Ventricle by Two-Dimensional Echocardiography”.

2.10 Cancer Staging

[AJCC] American Joint Committee on Cancer. 2002. Sixth. AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook: From the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Springer-Verlag. 0-387-95270-5.

2.11 Quantitative Arteriography and Ventriculography

[Sheehan, 1986] Circulation. Sheehan FH, Bolson EL, Dodge HT, Mathey DG, Schofer J, and Woo HW. 1986. 74. 2. 293-305. “Advantages and applications of the centerline method for characterizing regional ventricular function”. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.74.2.293

[Slager, 1986] J Am Coll Cardiol.. Slager CJ, Hooghoudt TE, Serruys PW, Schuurbiers JC, Reiber JH, Meester GT, Verdouw PD, and Hugenholtz PG. 1986. 6. 2. 317-26. “Quantitative assessment of regional left ventricular motion using endocardial landmarks”. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(86)80498-3

[Kennedy, 1970] Am Heart J. Kennedy JW, Trenholme SE, and Kasser IS. 1970. 80. 3. 343. “Left ventricular volume and mass from single-plane cineangiocardiogram. A comparison of anteroposterior and right anterior oblique methods”.

[Dodge, 1960] Am Heart J. Dodge HT, Sandler H, Ballew DW, and Lord JD. 1960. 60. 5. 762. “The use of biplane angiocardiography for the measurement of left ventricular volume in man”. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0002870360903598 .

[Wynne, 1978] Am J Cardiol. Wynne J, Green LH, Mann T, Levin D, and Grossman W. 1978. 41. 4. 726. “Estimation of left ventricular volumes in man from biplane cineangiograms filmed in oblique projections”.

[Boak, 1977] Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. Boak, JG, Bove AA, Kreulen T, and Spann JF. 1977. 3. 3. 217-30. “A geometric basis for calculation of right ventricular volume in man”. doi:10.1002/ccd.1810030305

[Ferlinz, 1977] Am Heart J. Ferlinz J. 1977. 94. 1. 87-90. “Measurements of right ventricular volumes in man from single plane cineangiograms. A comparison to the biplane approach”. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870377803487 .

[Graham, 1973] Circulation. Graham TP, Jarmakani JM, Atwood GF, and Canent RV. 1973. 47. 1. 144-53. “Right ventricular volume determinations in children. Normal values and observations with volume or pressure overload”. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.47.1.144

[Arcilla, 1971] Chest. Arcilla RA, Tsai P, Thilenius O, and Ranniger K. 1971. 60. 5. 446. “Angiographic method for volume estimation of right and left ventricles”. doi:10.1378/chest.60.5.446

2.12 IVUS

[Mintz, 2001] Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Mintz GS. 2001. 37. 5. 1478-1492. “American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS)”. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01175-5

[Di Mario, 1998] European Heart Journal. Di Mario C. 1998. 19. 2. 207-229. “Clinical Application and Image Interpretation in Intravascular Ultrasound”. doi:10.1053/euhj.1996.0433

[Tobis and Yock] Tobis JM and Yock PC. 1992. Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging. 0443088098.

2.13 C-RADS CT Colonography Reporting and Data System

[Zalis, 2005] Radiology. Zalis ME. 2005. 236. 1. 3-9. “CT Colonography Reporting and Data System: A Consensus Proposal”. doi:10.1148/radiol.2361041926

2.14 Implants

[Eggli, 1998] J Bone Joint Surg Br. Eggli S, Pisan M, and Müller ME. 1998. 80-B. 3. 382-390. “The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty”. http://www.bjj.boneandjoint.org.uk/content/80-B/3/382 .

Prev     Next
1 Scope and Field of Application  Home  3 Definitions